Files

Download

Download Full Text (327 KB)

Description

Recommended citation: Paul Jerome McLaughlin, Jr., Journal of Medical Law and Ethics, Volume 4, Number 1, March 2016, pp. 23-38 (16).

The practice of infant male circumcision has been debated by legal and medical experts for years. The practice, once seen as a social norm, has come under opposition by children’s rights, legal, and medical organizations around the world. In order to meet the requirements of international treaty law and allow infant male children the fullest opportunity for self determination, infant male circumcision must be treated under the law and by medical practitioners with the same degree of opposition that female genital mutilation has received.

Publication Date

2016

Publisher

Journal of Medical Law and Ethics

Keywords

medical law, ethics, infant male circumcision, international law

Disciplines

Health Law and Policy | International Law | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Legal and Medical Ethical Entanglements of Infant Male Circumcision and International Law

Share

COinS