THE CONFUSION OF PHILIP MORRIS: HOW THE SUPREME COURT CAME TO HOLD THAT PUNITIVE DAMAGES CANNOT BE USED TO PUNISH FOR HARM TO NON-PARTIES, BUT THAT JURORS ARE ALLOWED TO CONSIDER HARM TO NON-PARTIES WHEN DECIDING TO IMPOSE PUNITIVE DAMAGES

Authors

Anne Passino

Recommended Citation

Passino, Anne (2007) "THE CONFUSION OF PHILIP MORRIS: HOW THE SUPREME COURT CAME TO HOLD THAT PUNITIVE DAMAGES CANNOT BE USED TO PUNISH FOR HARM TO NON-PARTIES, BUT THAT JURORS ARE ALLOWED TO CONSIDER HARM TO NON-PARTIES WHEN DECIDING TO IMPOSE PUNITIVE DAMAGES," Tennessee Journal of Law and Policy: Vol. 3: Iss. 2, Article 4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70658/1940-4131.1115
Available at: https://ir.law.utk.edu/tjlp/vol3/iss2/4